
Linguistic Justice takes as its premise that all languages, language varieties, and accents are legitimate and equal. An approach to oral presentations that is grounded in linguistic justice is an approach that foregrounds equity for all speakers regardless of language, dialect, or accent. This approach understands language difference among speakers as a strength, not something that impedes their ability to communicate an effective scholarly presentation.
Anyone can be a successful scholarly speaker! But too often, students feel that the way they speak might prevent them from effectively sharing their research. Such doubts are, in part, rooted in the way that students learn about scholarly speaking. Many students are taught to think of the scholarly presentation as a “performance.” Our research has taught us that when students think about scholarly presentations this way, they focus on elements like “speaking clearly,” “maintaining eye contact,” and “avoiding stutters and mistakes.” These tips can cause anxiety for presenters; moreover, they can imply that there’s one correct way to present or speak publicly. This can cause extra anxiety for students who speak differently—whether due to accent, neurodivergence, gender identity, sexuality, or any other factor that impacts how a person speaks and presents themself.
Instead of taking a performance-focused approach to scholarly presentations, we believe that the scholarly presentation should be understood primarily as an opportunity to communicate about your research. The quality of a presentation is not determined by how you sound, how you look, or how you act while you present; instead, a successful presentation is one in which you find effective ways to communicate your ideas with your audience.
We recognize that human beings are remarkably diverse communicators who can effectively communicate their ideas in a wide variety of ways. Below, we focus on an approach that celebrates one aspect of this diversity — what scholars call “linguistic diversity.” Linguistic diversity refers not just to the number of different languages spoken but also the many ways that a culture’s “official” languages are spoken. Defending and increasing linguistic diversity means fighting for “linguistic justice.” On this page, we share more about how to approach oral presentations through a “linguistic justice” lens.
If you are an instructor looking for ways to cultivate linguistic justice in your classroom, click here.
Some performance-focused approaches to oral presentations can uphold prejudices toward “proper” language use. Advice like “speak clearly” might suggest to speakers that their accent can prevent them from being effective presenters. However, as linguists like to remind us, everyone has an accent! While there is no pure or neutral way of speaking a language, different ways of speaking nevertheless are often judged as better or worse. For instance, the linguist Rosina Lippi-Green observes the disadvantages experienced by second-language speakers, noting that some presenters will be stigmatized based on how they sound speaking English, even though the way their spoken English sounds “cannot predict the quality and effectiveness of any given utterance or that person’s worth as a communicator.” What Lippi-Green is talking about here is called “linguistic discrimination.” Fighting for linguistic justice means rejecting linguistic discrimination and recognizing the value in different ways of speaking.
Linguistic discrimination doesn’t only impact presenters with accents but also affects students who speak differently for various reasons. Scholars have found that women are more likely to feel less confident in their voices than men (Ferreira Marinho et al. 2017); neurodivergent students may find normative public speaking advice about maintaining eye-contact or a still posture impossible to follow (Price 2011); and presentation skills textbooks that focus on dress and voice can marginalize and disadvantage trans students (Sanchez 2019).
Watch the video below for a quick introduction to linguistic discrimination and linguistic justice:
| Reflect | |
|---|---|
Some questions you may want to ask yourself after watching this video:
|
What can you do?
Improving linguistic justice on campus requires cultural change that can only be achieved with collective effort and institutional support. It is not the individual responsibility of a student to change the attitudes or expectations of their peers or instructors. Nonetheless, a better understanding of the relationship between language, identity, and discrimination can help you feel more confident in oral presentation settings and allow you to grow both as a presenter and an audience member.
- Develop your “Critical Language Awareness.” Recognize that speaking is not something that can be done in “right” or “wrong” ways, and that such judgments are deeply tied to power dynamics in society. Check out the resources and readings linked below to learn more. Knowing that language norms are shaped by culture, and that there is not just one correct way to speak, can be empowering.
- Some students who speak English as an additional language may feel self-conscious about the way they speak English, particularly in oral presentations. While this is a natural feeling, see if you can focus less on what you feel are the “weaknesses” in your English ability or pronunciations, and more on the strengths you bring as a multilingual student. Consider how you can use the deep resources of all the languages you speak in your academic work.
- When listening to a presentation, think about what your responsibilities are as the listener. Instead of tuning out a voice that, to you, seems different or hard to understand, try leaning in and listening harder. Instead of asking someone to repeat themselves, check in with yourself first to see what you can do to make the communication go more smoothly.
- Remember that everyone has an accent. All over the world, certain languages or accents are awarded higher status than others, but these status hierarchies are due to cultural norms and not the speaker’s ability to communicate their message.
For further reading about linguistic justice, click here
Ferreira Marinho, Anna Carolina, Adriane Mesquita de Medeiros, Ana Cristina Côrtes Gama, and Leticia Caldas Teixeira. “Fear of Public Speaking: Perception of College Students and Correlates.” Journal of Voice, vol. 31, no. 1, 2022, pp. 7–11.
Lippi-Green, Rosina. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. Routledge, 2011.
Price, Margaret. Mad at School: Rhetorics of Mental Disability and Academic Life. U of Michigan P, 2011.
Sánchez, Fernando. “Trans Students’ Right to their own Gender in Professional Communication Courses: A Textbook Analysis of Attire and Voice Standards in Oral Presentations.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 49, no. 2, 2019, pp. 183–212.
Learning more about linguistic justice can be a way to name what you are experiencing, advocate for yourself, and be part of conversations about equity and language. Here are some key terms:
A field of study that examines the intersection of race and language, exploring how racial ideologies shape the way language is perceived, evaluated, and used. Raciolinguistics argues that accent discrimination and language-based judgment cannot be separated from race: when someone's accent is marked as foreign or inferior, racial assumptions are almost always at work in that judgment.
See: Flores, Nelson, and Jonathan Rosa. “Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 85, no. 2, 2016, pp. 149–171.
Discrimination or prejudice against individuals based on their language, accent, or dialect. The term was coined by French linguist Philippe Blanchet in the context of French nationalism and French language cultures. It is related to the term "linguicism" which is defined as “[i]deologies, structures, and practices which are used to legitimate, effectuate, regulate, and reproduce social inequality on the basis of language.”
See: Blanchet, Phillipe. Discriminations: Combattre la Glottophobie, 2016.
Skutnabb-Kangas, Tove. Linguistic Genocide in Education – Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? Routledge, 2003.
The widespread belief that there is one correct, superior form of a language, and that deviations from it are errors. In Canada and most English-speaking institutions, this takes the form of privileging white, North American-educated English as the neutral default. Standard language ideology is the ideological foundation of accent discrimination: it naturalizes what is in fact a historically constructed hierarchy.
See: Lippi-Green, Rosina. English with an Accent: Language, Ideology and Discrimination in the United States. 2nd ed. Taylor-Francis, 2012.
A state of self-consciousness about one's own language use, typically produced by repeated experiences of correction, misunderstanding, or social exclusion based on how one speaks. Linguistic insecurity is documented in Statistics Canada's 2022 survey: 31% of English speakers in Quebec and 24% of French speakers outside Quebec reported hesitating to use their minority language due to insecurity. At UBC, this may manifest as self-silencing in classrooms and labs.
See: Statistics Canada. Survey on the Official Language Minority Population. 2022. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/241216/dq241216b-eng.htm
Gramling, David, and Ervin Malakaj. Linguaphobia, Linguistic Indifference, and the Monolingual University. 2025. https://monolingual.ubc.ca
A pedagogical and theoretical framework that views multilingual speakers not as operating in separate, bounded language systems, but as drawing fluidly from a unified linguistic repertoire. Translanguaging rejects the idea that switching between languages represents a deficit or a failure of competence. Instead, it recognizes the full complexity of multilingual meaning-making as an asset.
See: Wei, Li, and Ofelia Garcia. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Springer, 2014.
The practice of shifting between languages, dialects, or registers depending on social context. While often framed as a neutral skill, code-switching in the context of linguistic justice refers specifically to the labor required of non-dominant speakers to adapt their speech to dominant norms in order to be accepted, understood, or hired. This labor is unequally distributed and psychologically costly.
See: Young, Vershawn Ashanti. “Nah, We Straight”: An Argument Against Code Switching. JAC, vol. 29, no. 1/2, 2009, pp. 49-76.
A practice and pedagogical approach that integrates multiple languages, dialects, and registers within a single piece of communication, including academic writing. Unlike code-switching, which implies alternating between separate systems, code-meshing treats multilingual expression as unified and legitimate. It challenges the expectation that academic writing must be conducted in Standard Academic English alone.
See: Young, Vershawn Ashanti, and Aja Y. Martinez, eds. Code-Meshing as World English: Pedagogy, Policy, Performance. National Council of Teachers of English, 2011.
A framework that positions language as central to civic participation and democratic life. Linguistic citizenship argues that full participation in a society, including in education and public life, requires not just the right to speak, but the right to be heard in one's own language. Applied to the university, it asks: whose languages count as legitimate here, and who bears the cost of translation?
See: Stroud, Christopher. African Mother-Tongue Programmes and the Politics of Language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 22, no. 4, 2001.
Deumert, Ana, Tommaso M. Milani, and Quentin Williams. Struggles for Multilingualism and Linguistic Citizenship. DeGruyter Brill, 2022.
Thanks to Ihomehe Agbebaku for filming and editing the above video and for assembling the definitions featured on this page. We are also indebted to Dr. Sandra Zappa-Hollman and to Dr. Marie-Eve Bouchard for their ongoing contributions to our understanding of linguistic equity.